An independent policy institute — 501(c)(3) in formation

Frontier technology deserves policy built on what survives testing.

GovThink develops release frameworks for dual-use frontier technology and maintains a public registry of tested hypotheses — including, deliberately, the ones that fail. In a field crowded with claims, the record is the product.

Est. 2026 · Washington-facing · Founder-funded

Mission

Make the honest path the credible path.

Advanced portable energy and humanoid robotics are arriving together, and both are dual-use by nature. The public conversation about them is dominated by two failure modes: unverifiable claims that poison serious inquiry, and blanket dismissal that cedes the field to the unserious.

GovThink exists to build the third path — testable claims, published outcomes in either direction, and release frameworks that let breakthrough technology reach the people who need it first without reaching the people who would misuse it.

Programs

Four programs. One standard.

01

Dual-Use Release Frameworks

Policy architecture for releasing high-density portable energy responsibly: platform-keyed modules, tamper-inert designs, staged availability, and government engagement ahead of wider release. Written for agencies and lawmakers, not for pitch decks.

02

The Null Results Registry

A public ledger of frontier-energy hypotheses under structured test — with retirements published alongside successes, and the measurement that decided each. A negative result that saves the next twenty labs from repeating the work is a public good.

03

Technology Transfer & U.S. Competitiveness

Briefings on where energy density binds American robotics, advanced materials, and defense readiness — and how transfer policy can keep testable breakthroughs, when they occur, developed and governed domestically.

04

Veterans-First Applications

The case for sequencing advanced robotics toward assistive and prosthetic applications for veterans before broader deployment — the population with the clearest need, the strongest claim, and the most rigorous clinical pathway.

The principle

Two questions, applied to every claim.

A century of frontier-energy history is littered with demonstrations that were never instrumented. Our standard — for the work we track and for the policy we write — fits in one sentence:

What is the net energy source — and where is the colder sink?

Every real power source in history answers both. Claims that cannot are retired on the record, not argued about indefinitely. Policy built on this standard can engage frontier research seriously without inheriting its credibility problems.

The registry

What is under test, and what the test decided.

Every entry names a specific, historically documented configuration; carries its status through characterization, conservation testing, and verdict; and remains on the record permanently — in either direction.

Hypothesis Registry Rev. 001 · August 2026
GT-001 Solid-state magnetic-core configuration, mid-1980s, claimed self-sustained output — never independently instrumented in period. Operating partner: EnergyWave, Inc. · Protocol: characterize → conservation-test → extract or retire Under characterization
GT-002 Reserved — second module selected on completion of GT-001, from the candidate list maintained with technical advisors. Selection criteria: specific, documented, testable to destruction Pending
Registry entries state what is claimed and what has been measured — never more. Verdicts are published with the deciding measurement. No entry is removed.

Independence & affiliations

Who we are, and who we are not.

Relationship to EnergyWave, Inc.

GovThink was founded by the founder of EnergyWave, Inc., a Delaware research venture, and currently tracks EnergyWave's research modules in the registry. The institute is a separate legal entity with a public-interest mission: its commitment to publishing null results applies with full force to affiliated work. An institute that publishes only its affiliates' successes is a marketing department; this one is designed not to be.

What we don't do

GovThink does not certify devices, endorse investment, or advance claims that have not survived instrumented testing. Names of collaborating researchers and advisors appear only with their consent and in connection with published work. Positions on specific technologies wait for the registry, not the other way around.

Contact

Briefings, registry inquiries, and collaboration.

We engage with congressional and agency staff, technical reviewers, veterans' organizations, and researchers with specific, documented, testable claims.

contact@govthink.org